Code Review Standards for AI-Assisted Pull Requests
AI-generated code needs review standards built for invisible assumptions, not surface mistakes.
Senior Contributing Writer
Taryn spent eight years as a CTO at a series of mission-driven startups before turning to editorial work, where she now covers the intersection of technical strategy and social impact. Her hands-on experience shepherding three products from napkin sketch to Series A informs her no-nonsense take on engineering decisions.
13 stories
AI-generated code needs review standards built for invisible assumptions, not surface mistakes.
Senior engineers must review AI code for security, architecture, and system-critical work.
Technical debt in early systems compounds response time once production breaks.
You can't move a no-code app to production without first escaping vendor lock-in.
Four deployment strategies and when each one actually protects your paying customers.
Technical debt from your MVP will eventually choke growth if you don't modernize strategically.
Understand what type of debt you have before deciding whether to rebuild or refactor.
Design principles that prevent MVPs from breaking under real-world demand.
Small teams can sustain productivity by dedicating 15-20% of each sprint to reducing debt.
How to assess whether your engineering partner will actually support you after launch.
Retainers lock in institutional knowledge; project contracts reset context with each phase.
Each model solves a different problem, not a quality hierarchy.
Keeping data safe requires strategy, sequencing, and separate deployments.